SMusatov
/
SuperSlicer
mirror of https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSlicer.git


			
				
					
						
						
							123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839
							<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="fr">
<head>
  <meta charset="utf-8">
  <title>Ironing pattern calibration</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Ironing pattern calibration</h1>
<p>You need to do the filament flow calibration and the bridge flow ratio before this one. It's better if you have done the filament temperature.</p>
<p>This test will print tests samples with various level of obver-bridge flow ratio, between 100 and 125. Choose the lowest value where the top surface is smooth without rough "holes".</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<table>
<tbody>
<h4>Exemple:</h4>
<tr>
<td><img src="./100.jpg" width="150" height="100" /></td>
<td><img src="./105.jpg" width="150" height="100" /></td>
<td><img src="./110.jpg" width="150" height="100" /></td>
<td><img src="./115.jpg" width="150" height="100" /></td>
<td><img src="./120.jpg" width="150" height="100" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">not flat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">not flat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">not flat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">flat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">Flat</td>
</tr>
</table>
Hee, we can see that artifact exists until the over-brodge flow was set to 115. It was flat from the flow calibration, if it's not now, it's because the bridges below the top surfaces are dropping a bit, and so there are more volume to fill afterwards. Here, 115 should be enough, but 120 is a more safe bet.

<h2>Advice</h2>
<p>TODO</p>
</ul>
<h2>Notes</h2>
<p>This test set the setting "complete individual objects" to true, so you may want to reset your print settings afterwards</p>
<p>Licence for models used for this calibration test: CC BY-SA 3.0</p>
</body>
</html>