font-Roboto-Classic/Docs/Compare/master_ttf_vs_v2_138

v2.138 unhinted offical vs master_ttf

Regression tests to determine whether the .ufos in master_ufo/ produce acceptable static fonts.

Building ttfs

master_ttf/ built with fontmake v1.6.0 using the following cli:

FONTS=$(ls -d ./master_ufo/*.ufo/)
for f in $FONTS
do
  fontmake -u $f -o ttf --no-production-names
done;

Generating diffs

Diffs produced with fontdiffenator and diffbrowsers

Summary for commit e7ece644e5

• No marks are missing
• mark below for uni1E2C fixed
• No mkmks missing
• No kerns are missing
• No glyphs are missing
• caretSlopeRun, caretSlopeRise in italics are different
• Modified glyphs: Some distortions, are they acceptable? more distortions are occuring in the italic and condensed styles

Diff Notes

Following summary has been made by M Foley by reviewing each diff image

Modified Glyphs

• uni015E which looks like a 'K' now features a double story construction. Fixes https://github.com/google/roboto/issues/289
• sampi, uni0236, uni030F, uni1AB5 have the most notable distortions. Other glyphs seem fine

Roboto-LightItalic/glyphs_modified/gifs/Desktop_Windows_7_ie9.0.gif

Modified Marks

• Changes only uni1E2C